Cisco NCS-55A1-24QX-SYS: High-Density 100G/40
Platform Overview and Target Applications T...
Industry teardowns reveal the HCI-FI-64108-M6 combines Cisco UCS C220 M6 server architecture with custom HyperFlex HXDP firmware. Unlike Cisco’s official HX220c-M6 node, this variant features:
Tested on HyperFlex 4.5(2a) with Intersight management:
Storage Policy Conflicts
Third-party NVMe triggers HX_ERR_SSD_VENDOR_UNSUPPORTED
during cluster expansion
Firmware Signature Battles
Cisco HX Installer log:
[ERROR] Component 12 (Drive 7): Hash mismatch (Expected 0x8d3a... / Received 0xfe72...)
hx-boot-util --set-param IgnoreHWCompatCheck=1
Metric | HX220c-M6 (Cisco) | HCI-FI-64108-M6 |
---|---|---|
4K Random Read IOPS | 1,450,000 | 1,210,000 |
vMotion Migration Time (8TB) | 18m32s | 27m14s |
Power Draw (Full Load) | 412W | 487W |
While the HCI-FI-64108-M6 appears 35% cheaper than Cisco’s $64,120 list price:
Q: Does it integrate with VMware vSAN?
A: Only with manual driver injection – Cisco’s HX vSphere Custom ISO rejects third-party HBAs.
Q: Can I mix with genuine Cisco nodes?
A: Technically possible but triggers HX_HEALTH_ALT_HW_DETECTED
, disabling predictive analytics.
For Cisco-validated hyperconverged solutions, explore HCI-FI-64108-M6 alternatives.
Having managed 60+ HyperFlex clusters, I’ve observed third-party nodes create technical debt avalanches. While tempting for lab environments, production deployments suffer from:
The HCI-FI-64108-M6 exemplifies the false economy of third-party HCI – what saves 20kupfrontoftencosts20k upfront often costs 20kupfrontoftencosts200k+ in unplanned downtime and remediation. For enterprises requiring true hyperconverged reliability, Cisco’s hardware/software symbiosis remains non-negotiable.