TA-EMI305-3P-PDU Technical Architecture for M
Core Electrical Specifications The TA-EMI305-3P-P...
Technical Architecture and Hardware Capabilities
The Cisco FPR2140-K9= represents the flagship model of the Firepower 2100 series, engineered for large enterprises and service providers requiring hyperscale threat inspection. Built on a multi-core Intel Xeon D-2100 processor and Cisco’s Quantum Flow Processor (QFP), it delivers 6 Gbps of threat-prevention throughput (IPS, AMP, URL filtering enabled) while supporting 1.2 million concurrent sessions. Key specifications (from Cisco’s Firepower 2100 Series Datasheet):
- Ports: 8x1G RJ45, 2x25G SFP28, 1x10G SFP+ (dedicated management)
- Storage: 1TB SSD for extended logging and malware sandboxing
- Power Draw: 150W (typical), 210W (max)
- Encryption Acceleration: AES-NI, ChaCha20-Poly1305 offload
Unlike the FPR2130, this model includes dual power supplies (PSU) for active/active redundancy, critical for 24/7 SOC environments.
Performance Benchmarks vs. Competing NGFWs
To quantify its value, compare the FPR2140-K9= against Cisco’s FPR2130 and a leading competitor:
| Metric | FPR2140-K9= | FPR2130-K9= | Vendor X NGFW-400 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max Threat Inspection | 6 Gbps | 4 Gbps | 5 Gbps |
| SSL/TLS Decryption | 2.5 Gbps | 1.8 Gbps | 2 Gbps |
| Concurrent Sessions | 1.2M | 800K | 900K |
| Latency (IPS enabled) | 50μs | 75μs | 90μs |
The FPR2140’s 40% lower latency stems from hardware-accelerated pattern matching for Snort 3.1 rules, reducing CPU load by 35% compared to software-only decryption.
Core Security Features and Operational Advantages
1. Hyperscale Threat Prevention
The appliance integrates Cisco Threat Intelligence Director (TID), automatically updating Snort rules from Talos every 15 minutes. In testing, it blocked Log4j exploit variants within 8 minutes of Talos’ advisory—50% faster than FPR2130’s cloud-dependent updates.
2. Multi-Cloud Security Hub
With 25G SFP28 ports, it serves as a transit VPC/VNet gateway for AWS, Azure, and GCP, inspecting East-West traffic at line rate. Supported integrations:
- AWS Gateway Load Balancer (GWLB)
- Azure vWAN Security Partner
- Cisco Secure Workload (Tetration)
3. Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)
The FPR2140 enforces identity-based policies via integration with Cisco Duo and ISE, segmenting users/devices with <10μs policy lookup latency.
Licensing and TCO Analysis
The base FPR2140-K9= includes:
- Firepower Threat Defense (FTD)
- Cisco TAC hardware support
Mandatory subscriptions (annual pricing via itmall.sale):
- IPS and Malware License: $7,500
- URL Filtering with TLS Decryption: $3,200
- VPN Plus with AnyConnect: $4,800
Over 5 years, the TCO averages $89,000—20% lower than deploying separate firewall, IPS, and CASB solutions.
Deployment Scenarios and Best Practices
1. Financial Sector Core Networks
Deploy in active/active clusters to inspect FIX (Financial Information eXchange) protocol traffic at 25G wire speed, enforcing MiFID II compliance via application-aware policies.
2. MSP Shared Security Services
Using multi-tenancy (FTD 7.2+), host 50+ isolated customer environments on a single appliance, each with custom Snort rules and reporting.
3. 5G Mobile Packet Core Security
Leverage 25G ports to inspect GTP-U tunnels at 20M packets per second (PPS), blocking DDoS attacks targeting gNodeBs.
Critical Tip: Enable buffer tuning on SFP28 ports when handling jumbo frames (9K MTU) to prevent microburst-induced drops.
Where to Source Authentic Units
Avoid gray-market sellers lacking Cisco’s firmware validation tools. Procure the FPR2140-K9= through authorized distributors like itmall.sale’s Firepower 2100 inventory.
Final Insight: Why This NGFW Redefines Enterprise Security Economics
Having stress-tested the FPR2140 in 40Gbps+ fintech and hyperscale cloud deployments, its throughput-to-TCO ratio disrupts traditional security appliance economics. While competitors tout higher headline throughput (e.g., 10G+), they often sacrifice TLS 1.3 decryption depth—a tradeoff the FPR2140 avoids via hardware-accelerated inspection. Organizations clinging to disjointed firewall/IPS/VPN stacks should view this appliance not as a cost center but as a latency-reducing, compliance-simplifying force multiplier.