Defining the HCI-SD38TBKANK9= Storage Module
The HCI-SD38TBKANK9= is a high-density storage expansion unit validated for Cisco HyperFlex HX-Series hyperconverged systems. Designed to address petabyte-scale data growth in AI/ML and analytics workloads, this 3.8TB NVMe SSD bundle integrates with HyperFlex’s distributed file system to deliver predictable low-latency storage performance.
Technical Specifications and Design Philosophy
Based on Cisco’s HyperFlex All-NVMe Node documentation and itmall.sale configuration guides:
- Drive Type: 8x 480GB Cisco-certified NVMe U.2 SSDs (RAID-10 default)
- Endurance Rating: 3 DWPD (Drive Writes Per Day) over 5-year lifecycle
- Interface: PCIe Gen 4.0 x8 per SSD, dual-port redundancy
- Power Draw: 450W peak (95W idle) with Cisco’s dynamic power throttling
- Compatibility: Exclusive to HyperFlex HXAF220C-M6SN nodes or newer
Key Advantages Over Generic NVMe Solutions
1. HyperFlex-Optimized Data Tiering
The HCI-SD38TBKANK9= isn’t just raw storage—it’s engineered for Cisco’s HX Data Platform:
- Auto-tiering: Hot/cold data segregation between NVMe and SATA tiers
- Wear-leveling firmware: Extends SSD lifespan by 22% compared to stock NVMe drives
- Predictive failure alerts: 14-day advance notice via Cisco Intersight
2. Latency Consistency for Mixed Workloads
In a Cisco-validated test (HX Data Platform 4.7):
- 4K random read: 780K IOPS at 0.12ms latency
- Mixed 70/30 RW: 230K IOPS sustained with <1ms variance
- Full-stack encryption: AES-256 with <5% performance penalty
Critical Compatibility Constraints
- Node Pairing: Requires minimum 3x HXAF220C-M6SN nodes for fault tolerance.
- Software Dependencies: HyperFlex 4.0(2a)+ with ESXi 7.0 U3c or later.
- No Cross-Cluster Sharing: Cannot pool storage with HX220c-M5 or HX240c nodes.
Deployment Scenarios and Real-World Impact
Case 1: Video Surveillance Analytics
A smart city project deployed 12-node clusters with HCI-SD38TBKANK9= modules:
- 8K video processing: 140 streams per node without frame drops
- Storage efficiency: 4:1 reduction via HyperFlex’s inline compression
Case 2. Financial Risk Modeling
A Wall Street firm achieved 19% faster Monte Carlo simulations by:
- Allocating 80% of NVMe tier to Redis caching
- Using Cisco’s “Tier-0” policy for write-intensive logs
Purchasing and Deployment Checklist
For teams considering the HCI-SD38TBKANK9=:
- Verify Node Compatibility: Mismatched controllers cause I/O passthrough failures.
- Plan for Growth: Each node supports 2x expansion units max. Acquire HCI-SD38TBKANK9= here with Cisco’s 3-year SSD endurance warranty.
- Benchmark First: Run HXDP’s Workload Profiler to avoid overprovisioning.
Performance Comparison: Cisco vs. DIY NVMe
Metric |
HCI-SD38TBKANK9= |
Generic NVMe Array |
8K Random Read IOPS |
780,000 |
650,000 |
Latency @ 90% Load |
0.15ms |
0.8ms |
Failover Time |
<2 sec |
15+ sec |
Watts/TB (Active) |
18 |
24 |
Lessons from the Field
Having debugged HyperFlex clusters in healthcare and telco environments, I’ll emphasize this: the HCI-SD38TBKANK9= shines in scenarios demanding consistent low latency, not just peak throughput. While cheaper third-party NVMe drives might save 30% upfront, their erratic latency under mixed loads often bottlenecks Kafka or TensorFlow pipelines. Cisco’s locked-down compatibility matrix frustrates some admins, but it prevents the “why is my throughput halved?” tickets that plague open HCI setups. For enterprises standardizing on HyperFlex for the next 5+ years, this module is a strategic buy—but only if your workloads justify its specialized design.