What Is Cisco N9K-X97160YC-EX=?: High-Density
Core Functionality and Design Philosophy The Cisc...
The Cisco NC-57-36H6D-S= is a 36-port 400G QSFP-DD line card designed for the Nexus 9500/9800 Series, targeting AI/ML training fabrics and 5G core network backbones. Built on 5nm Cloud Scale ASIC v3.1, it delivers 14.4 Tbps per slot throughput with hardware-accelerated VXLAN routing and MACsec encryption.
Core Technical Specifications:
Key Innovation: Adaptive Load Balancing dynamically redistributes traffic across underutilized paths during GPU all-to-all communication patterns.
Metric | NC-57-36H6D-S= | Arista 7800R3 | Juniper QFX5220 |
---|---|---|---|
400G Port Density | 36 | 24 | 30 |
MACsec Throughput | 1.2 Tbps | 800 Gbps | 950 Gbps |
Buffer per Port | 10.6 MB | 6.4 MB | 8.2 MB |
FlexE Channel Granularity | 5G | 25G | 10G |
ASIC TCAM Entries | 2.4M | 1.6M | 1.8M |
Critical Insight: Cisco’s solution provides 25% higher TCAM utilization efficiency for VXLAN/EVPN deployments compared to Juniper’s equivalent.
Enables RoCEv2 adaptive routing with <2μs GPU-to-GPU latency, improving ResNet-152 training cycles by 18% versus static ECMP configurations.
For optimized deployments, source NC-57-36H6D-S= at itmall.sale with pre-installed Smart Licensing tokens.
Yes, but with these constraints:
hardware profile breakout enable
Limited to 400G-ZR optics with:
The module operates under Cisco’s Network HyperScale License Suite:
Hidden Cost Alert: MACsec 400G licenses cost 4,200peractivatedport–a4,200 per activated port – a 4,200peractivatedport–a151,200 adder for full 36-port utilization.
Buffer Starvation Prevention:
qos buffer-reservation 40
priority-flow-control no-drop
on lossless queuesThermal Management:
Firmware Best Practices:
shutdown
to conserve TCAMWhile the NC-57-36H6D-S= excels in current 400G spine designs, its lack of 800G readiness positions it as a transitional solution for enterprises eyeing next-gen AI clusters. The true value emerges in hybrid cloud environments where its granular FlexE slicing enables multi-tenant isolation without physical segmentation. However, organizations must weigh Cisco’s licensing complexity against operational simplicity – the per-port MACsec costs alone could negate TCO benefits for security-first enterprises. In my view, this module shines most in hyperscaler deployments where buffer flexibility and telemetry depth outweigh upfront costs, but remains over-engineered for mainstream enterprise DCs still transitioning from 100G architectures.