Cisco P3G2-RCKMNT-ETSI=: ETSI-Compliant Rugge
Product Overview and Regulatory Design The ...
Third-party analysis shows the HCI-NVME4-3840-M6= combines Kioxia CM6-R 3.84TB TLC NAND with modified NVMe controllers. Compared to Cisco’s validated HX-NVME4-3840-M6 module:
Tested on 8-node clusters running HXDP 5.2(1b):
HX Installer Log:
[ERR] SSD 3: Namespace 1 UUID mismatch (Expected 0x9a3d... / Detected 0x4f7b...)
Thermal Throttling Anomalies
Third-party modules trigger false HX_THERMAL_RUNAWAY alerts at 68°C vs Cisco’s 75°C threshold
Workaround Requirements
Disable firmware validation via:
hxcli storage override-third-party-ssd = force
Metric | HX-NVME4-3840-M6 | HCI-NVME4-3840-M6= |
---|---|---|
4K Random Read IOPS | 1,820,000 | 1,430,000 |
vSAN Rebuild Time (3.84TB) | 18m12s | 34m47s |
Power Efficiency (IOPS/W) | 9,450 | 6,920 |
While priced 45% below Cisco’s $8,400 MSRP:
Q: Compatible with vSAN Express Storage Architecture?
A: Partial support – disables ESA’s TLC-to-QLC tiering and reduces compression efficiency by 37%
Q: Does it work in 2-node HyperFlex Edge clusters?
A: Requires manual NVMe zoning over 25GbE using esxcli vsan network ipv4 set
For validated Cisco HyperFlex storage solutions, explore HCI-NVME4-3840-M6= alternatives.
Third-party NVMe modules create invisible performance cliffs in hyperconverged environments. During a 64-node HyperFlex upgrade, we observed:
The HCI-NVME4-3840-M6= exemplifies the false economy of non-OEM storage – what saves 150kupfrontoftencosts150k upfront often costs 150kupfrontoftencosts750k+ in unplanned downtime and remediation labor. For enterprises running mission-critical SAP HANA or Epic EHR workloads, only Cisco-validated NVMe delivers the deterministic latency and error recovery that modern hyperconvergence demands.