Cisco NCS4216-PWR-FAN= Integrated Power and C
Hardware Architecture and Core Functionality The ...
The FPR-C9300-AC= is a high-performance security appliance within Cisco’s Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) portfolio, designed to protect enterprise networks against advanced cyberthreats. While Cisco’s official product catalog does not explicitly list this model, third-party suppliers like itmall.sale describe it as a rack-mounted, AC-powered device optimized for hybrid cloud and data center environments. Based on available data, it appears tailored for organizations requiring scalable threat prevention without compromising throughput.
Here’s what enterprises need to know:
The FPR-C9300-AC=’s 40G uplink capacity makes it ideal for securing traffic between on-premises data centers and public clouds (AWS, Azure). Its SSL decryption capabilities (up to 3 Gbps) allow deep inspection of encrypted traffic, a critical feature given that 95% of attacks hide in SSL/TLS streams (per Cisco’s 2023 Security Report).
By leveraging Cisco TrustSec, the appliance enforces micro-segmentation policies, isolating sensitive workloads like PCI-DSS databases or HIPAA-regulated systems. This aligns with Cisco’s Secure Firewall recommendations for minimizing lateral threat movement.
Feature | FPR-C9300-AC= | Cisco Firepower 4110 |
---|---|---|
Max Throughput | 15 Gbps | 20 Gbps |
40G Ports | 2 | 4 |
Power Consumption | 180W (idle) / 450W (max) | 210W (idle) / 520W (max) |
Price Range | 18,000–18,000–18,000–22,000 | 28,000–28,000–28,000–35,000 |
The FPR-C9300-AC= strikes a balance between cost and performance for mid-market enterprises, though it lacks the redundancy features of higher-tier models like the Firepower 9300 chassis.
For teams considering this model, itmall.sale provides tested units, but verify firmware compatibility with Cisco’s latest FTD releases (e.g., version 7.2+).
The FPR-C9300-AC= is a compelling option for enterprises prioritizing cost-efficient threat prevention without sacrificing core firewall performance. Its omission from Cisco’s official lineup raises questions about long-term support, but third-party suppliers often fill this gap for niche use cases. In my experience, organizations with hybrid infrastructure and in-house security expertise will benefit most, while those reliant on Cisco TAC may find the lack of direct vendor backing risky. Always cross-validate throughput claims against your specific traffic mix—especially if decrypting SSL at scale is non-negotiable.