Cisco UCS-S3260-3KASD32= Storage Server: Technical Architecture, Deployment Scenarios, and Lifecycle Management



​Overview of the UCS-S3260-3KASD32=​

The Cisco UCS-S3260-3KASD32= is a high-density storage server from Cisco’s Unified Computing System (UCS) S-Series, designed for large-scale data retention and archival workloads. Officially discontinued in 2021, this 3U chassis remains relevant for enterprises requiring petabyte-scale storage with backward compatibility for legacy applications. This analysis synthesizes data from Cisco’s archived technical documentation, EoL (End-of-Life) notices, and procurement insights from authorized resellers like itmall.sale.


​Hardware Architecture and Key Specifications​

Based on Cisco’s discontinued product briefs, the UCS-S3260-3KASD32= features:

  • ​Chassis Design​​: ​​3U form factor​​ with 60 front-accessible drive bays, supporting 3.5-inch SAS/SATA HDDs or SSDs.
  • ​Storage Capacity​​: ​​Up to 480TB raw​​ (using 8TB HDDs) or ​​192TB​​ (with 3.2TB SSDs), configurable in RAID 0/1/5/6/10/50/60.
  • ​Controllers​​: Dual ​​Cisco UCS 12G SAS modular RAID controllers​​ with 4GB cache (2GB per controller), battery-backed for write-back caching.
  • ​I/O Connectivity​​: ​​4x 40GbE QSFP+ uplinks​​ for SAN/NAS connectivity and 2x 1GbE management ports.
  • ​Compatibility​​: Cisco UCS Manager 3.2(3) or earlier, with limited integration into Intersight.

​Critical limitation​​: Lack of NVMe-oF (NVMe over Fabrics) support restricts performance in modern AI/ML pipelines requiring sub-millisecond latency.


​Target Workloads and Deployment Use Cases​

​1. Cold Data Archival​

The chassis’s 60-drive capacity and ​​0.73W/TB idle power consumption​​ made it ideal for HIPAA/GDPR-compliant archives, achieving a ​​$0.015/GB/month​​ storage cost.

​2. Media Asset Repositories​

Broadcasters and post-production studios utilized RAID 60 configurations with 8TB HDDs for 4K/8K video editing workflows, delivering ​​1.2GB/s sustained throughput​​.

​3. Backup Target for Virtualized Environments​

The server’s dual 40GbE uplinks supported Veeam Backup & Replication 9.5 environments, handling ​​10,000+ VM backups​​ with deduplication ratios up to 10:1.


​Operational Risks and Mitigation Strategies​

​End-of-Support Implications​

Cisco halted firmware updates and hardware replacements for the UCS-S3260-3KASD32= in 2022, exposing users to:

  • ​Unpatched Vulnerabilities​​: SAS controller exploits (e.g., CVE-2019-19377) remain unresolved.
  • ​Compatibility Gaps​​: Inability to integrate with VMware vSAN 7.0+ or modern S3-compatible object storage platforms.

​Workarounds​​:

  • Deploy ​​software-defined storage layers​​ (e.g., Ceph or MinIO) atop the raw storage pool to enable S3 APIs.
  • Use ​​third-party monitoring tools​​ like Nagios or Zabbix for predictive failure analysis, bypassing deprecated Cisco UCS Manager plugins.

​Performance Bottlenecks​

The 40GbE uplinks cap throughput at ​​4.8GB/s aggregate​​, creating bottlenecks for all-flash configurations. In RAID 6 setups with HDDs, rebuild times for 8TB drives exceed ​​36 hours​​, increasing array vulnerability.


​Procurement and Validation Best Practices​

When sourcing the UCS-S3260-3KASD32= through resellers:

  1. ​Hardware Authentication​​:

    • Verify Cisco’s ​​Unique Device Identifier (UDI)​​ and cross-reference chassis serial numbers via Cisco’s EoL validation portal.
    • Test SAS expander backplanes for signal integrity using tools like ​​sg3_utils​​ to detect degraded lanes.
  2. ​Component Validation​​:

    • Confirm drive sled compatibility—counterfeit sleds often lack proper airflow design, causing HDDs to overheat.
    • Validate RAID controller firmware (e.g., version 51.17.0-3517) to avoid cache coherence errors.
  3. ​Refurbishment Standards​​:

    • Demand ​​replacement of mid-plane connectors​​ and power supply capacitors to mitigate age-related failures.

For immediate procurement, itmall.sale offers refurbished UCS-S3260-3KASD32= units with 180-day reliability guarantees and pre-installed drive sleds.


​Comparative Analysis: UCS-S3260-3KASD32= vs. Modern Alternatives​

​Metric​ ​UCS-S3260-3KASD32=​ ​Cisco UCS X-Series (C480 ML)​
​Drive Bays​ 60 24
​Max Raw Capacity​ 480TB (HDD) / 192TB (SSD) 368TB (NVMe SSD)
​Throughput​ 4.8GB/s 28GB/s
​Latency​ 8ms (HDD) / 1.2ms (SSD) 0.1ms (NVMe)
​Management​ UCS Manager 3.2(3) Intersight with AIOps

​Key takeaway​​: The C480 ML delivers 5.8x higher throughput but costs 4.3x more per terabyte—a trade-off favoring the S3260-3KASD32= in budget-driven cold storage scenarios.


​Final Perspective​

The UCS-S3260-3KASD32= exemplifies Cisco’s legacy approach to petabyte-scale storage—prioritizing capacity over agility. Its continued use in sectors like healthcare or media, where data growth outpaces IT modernization budgets, underscores the practical reality of balancing innovation with fiscal constraints. While its technical limitations are undeniable in AI/ML or real-time analytics contexts, it remains a pragmatic choice for organizations needing to retain decades-old datasets without rearchitecting entire infrastructures. However, the absence of NVMe-oF and escalating maintenance costs for aging SAS backplanes increasingly render it a transitional solution. For teams persisting with its deployment, layering software-defined storage abstractions and rigorous health monitoring is critical to extending its operational viability. Ultimately, its value lies not in technological superiority but in bridging the gap between legacy data gravity and cloud-native futures.

Related Post

MSWS-UCAL-5=: Cisco’s Unified Wireless Cont

Technical Architecture & Core Capabilities The ​�...

CG113-4GW6B: How Does Cisco’s Industrial Ro

​​Core Specifications and Target Use Cases​​ Th...

A99-RP3-X-TR=: Why Is It Critical for High-Av

​​Defining the A99-RP3-X-TR=​​ The ​​A99-RP...