Product Overview and Key Applications
The Cisco PWR-CORD-IND-B= is a heavy-duty AC power cable engineered for Cisco networking equipment deployed in harsh industrial environments. Designed to meet IEC 60309 and UL 60320 standards, this cable supports devices requiring 250V/16A input, such as industrial routers, ruggedized switches, and outdoor wireless access points. Its reinforced construction addresses common failure points in extreme temperatures, moisture, and vibration-prone settings.
Technical Specifications and Durability Features
Electrical and Mechanical Properties
- Connector Type: IEC 60309 C19 (male) to C20 (female), rated for 16A continuous load.
- Voltage Rating: 250V AC (50/60 Hz), compliant with IEC 60950-1 for IT equipment safety.
- Conductor Gauge: 12 AWG copper cores with H05VV-F insulation, minimizing resistance (<0.05 Ω/m).
Environmental Resilience
- Temperature Range: -40°C to 70°C operational, -50°C to 105°C storage.
- Ingress Protection: IP67-rated connectors prevent dust/water ingress during monsoon or desert deployments.
- Abrasion Resistance: Double-layer PVC jacket withstands 50+ N/mm² tensile stress from cable trays or machinery.
Target Use Cases and Industry Applications
Oil and Gas Field Networks
The PWR-CORD-IND-B= powers Cisco IE3400 Heavy Duty Switches in upstream drilling rigs, where H2S gas resistance and explosion-proof conduit compatibility are non-negotiable.
Transportation and Smart Grids
- Rail Signaling Systems: Survives constant vibration (tested per EN 50155) in metro/train networks.
- Substation RTUs: Integrates with Cisco IR1101 routers for SCADA communications, immune to EMI from 400kV lines.
Outdoor Wireless Deployments
Used with Cisco Catalyst IW9167D Heavy Duty Access Points, the cable’s UV-stabilized jacket prevents degradation in direct sunlight.
Compatibility and Integration Guidelines
Supported Cisco Devices
- Routers: ASR 1000 Series, ISR 4000 with PWR-4450-DC= power supplies.
- Switches: Catalyst 9500/9400 in Network Equipment Building Systems (NEBS)-compliant setups.
Power Distribution Best Practices
- Circuit Load Balancing: Allocate ≤12A per PWR-CORD-IND-B= in 208V 3-phase PDUs to prevent overcurrent.
- Grounding: Bond cable shielding to chassis ground lugs using M4 stainless steel bolts (torque: 1.2 N·m).
Installation and Maintenance Protocols
Connector Handling
- Pre-Installation Inspection: Verify “Cisco OEM” holograms to counter counterfeit risks.
- Sealing: Engage IP67 connector gaskets with 25–30 N·m rotational force.
- Strain Relief: Secure cables within 50 mm of entry points using TPE-lined clamps.
Safety Precautions
- Arc Flash Mitigation: De-energize circuits before connecting to Cisco UPSP-600= backup systems.
- Lockout/Tagout (LOTO): Implement per NFPA 70E when servicing live industrial PDUs.
Troubleshooting Common Operational Issues
Intermittent Power Loss
- Root Cause: Loose terminals due to thermal cycling in foundries (ΔT > 50°C/hour).
- Solution: Apply No-Ox-ID A antioxidant compound to copper lugs.
Insulation Cracking
- Diagnosis: Check for ozone exposure near high-voltage transformers.
- Repair: Replace damaged sections with Cisco-recommended heat-shrink tubing (3:1 ratio).
Procurement and Vendor Considerations
For guaranteed compliance and warranty coverage, “PWR-CORD-IND-B=” is available exclusively through ITMall.sale, which provides batch-tested cables with Cisco’s Lifetime Hardware Warranty. Bulk orders (50+ units) often include free cable certifiers for field validation.
Engineer’s Viewpoint: Necessity vs. Over-Engineering
While the PWR-CORD-IND-B= excels in extreme conditions, its cost (3–4× standard cables) demands justification. For climate-controlled data centers, standard C19 cables suffice. However, in petrochemical plants or Arctic fiber huts, this cable’s resilience against thermal shock and chemical corrosion becomes mission-critical. The decision hinges on Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF) targets: if your operations can’t tolerate even 15 minutes of downtime annually, this investment is non-negotiable. Yet, for temporary deployments or mild environments, cheaper alternatives might align better with budgetary constraints—provided teams accept elevated replacement risks.