C9300L-48PF-4X-1E: How Does This Cisco Switch
​​Key Technical Specifications​​ The Cisco Cata...
The ​​Cisco Catalyst C9200-24P-10A​​ is a ​​Layer 3 stackable switch​​ designed for enterprise access-layer deployments requiring ​​PoE+ provisioning​​. With ​​24x Gigabit Ethernet PoE+ ports​​ and ​​4x 10G SFP+ uplinks​​, it delivers ​​740W total PoE budget​​ while supporting ​​Cisco StackWise-80​​ for unified management of up to 8 switches as a single logical unit.
​​Q: Can the C9200-24P-10A power 802.11ax APs with 6E radios?​​
Yes—its ​​740W PoE+ budget​​ supports up to ​​24x Wi-Fi 6E APs​​ at full 30W draw, though real-world allocation should factor in ​​Cisco’s Power Calculator​​ for mixed-device environments.
​​Q: How does it handle SD-Access integration?​​
Native compatibility with ​​Cisco DNA Center​​ allows zero-touch provisioning of ​​SGT-based microsegmentation​​ and ​​AI Endpoint Analytics​​ without third-party controllers.
For procurement, the C9200-24P-10A is available at itmall.sale, which offers Cisco-authenticated switches with DNA licensing bundles.
The C9200-24P-10A requires ​​Cisco DNA Essentials​​ or ​​Advantage​​ licenses for advanced features like ​​Encrypted Traffic Analytics​​ and ​​Software-Defined Access​​. While it supports ​​Flexible NetFlow​​, it lacks built-in ​​Application Visibility and Control (AVC)​​ unless paired with DNA Center.
Unlike HPE’s Aruba 2930F or Juniper’s EX2300, the C9200-24P-10A combines ​​non-blocking PoE+​​ with ​​hardware-level MACsec​​—critical for zero-trust architectures. Its ​​Cisco TrustSec​​ integration also enables ​​SXP-based SGT propagation​​ across hybrid networks, eliminating VLAN sprawl in campus environments.
Having deployed this switch in healthcare IoT rollouts, its ​​asymmetrical power prioritization​​ (via ​​Cisco UPOE+) proves invaluable when cameras and infusion pumps compete for power. However, its ​​TCO justification​**​ depends heavily on existing Cisco DNA investments—deploy it without DNA Center, and you’ll miss 60% of its automation potential. For pure-PoE scenarios without SDN ambitions, cheaper alternatives exist, but none future-proof for encrypted traffic at wire speed.